hckrnws

> And then, of course, the government got the videos taken down. Because these alpha disruptors who thought they were saving America by nuking grants for Holocaust documentaries and Black civil rights research turned out to be too fragile to withstand a little internet mockery for their dipshittery.

So who saved them and where can I watch them?

https://archive.org/details/Doge-Depositions-MLA-ACLS-AHA-La...

[flagged]

The grant for the digitalisation of black newspaper during the segregation is quite self-explanatory. Unless you're against archiving newspapers, and if you are, why?

And the documentary was on Jewish women treatment during the Holocaust, which, surprisingly does not exist yet. It is also easy to justify. In general, documentaries easily get some state grants to cover their production costs, because it's cheap education (more than action movies let's say) even though, in my opinion, the information density is low.

But if the argument is that grants shouldn't go towards documentaries, I can agree. If the argument is that it shouldn't go towards this specific documentary and others are fine, I would ask why? Is it because it's on women? On Jews? On the Holocaust?

He has views about "the Jews": https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47404503

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soft_power

I'm an anti-imperialist so I do appreciate America's efforts to paint the international stage with it's brains. Not sure if what comes next will be better but I'm optimistic.

Keep dreaming, li'l fella!

You need to do some reflection if you hear the term "Holocaust documentary" and don't see any material value in its creation.

Just ftr I believe in the holocaust and wouldn't want it repeated. But aren't there modern tragedies that could also receive more attention, and might be more impactful?

non sequitur / false dichotomy